The factory everyone cites has been quiet for two months

StrongDM's software factory is the canonical existence proof for non-interactive development: specs and scenarios in, agents write and test, no human reviews code. Its Weather Report is the most frequently updated page on that site, describing itself as "What models we're running today, how they're configured, and what role each one plays in the factory." The most recent entry in its log is dated June 4th, 2026. Two months on, the page is still a model roster and a set of parameter defaults: gpt-5.5 across the OpenAI text and code defaults, opus-4.8 for frontend aesthetics at max thinking, a consensus pair for sprint planning. The one evaluative line is about cost, not output: "Opus 4.8 is good when you need input from another model, but I would not daily drive anything with it right now; it burns too many tokens." The narrative pages have not moved since February. This is an absence and is reported as one: StrongDM has published no outcome data, throughput figure or defect rate at any point.

Why it matters: If you are citing StrongDM as evidence that lights-out production works, you are citing a model-configuration table and a February essay. That is worth knowing before you put it in a deck.